Gladiator Security Forum

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


There are 79 online users browsing:
1 members and 78 visitors
gtrtkk

> Latest Discussions
Terryala @ 09-2-10 17:43
Read: 13   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 09-2-10 15:01
Read: 21   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 09-2-10 14:43
Read: 16   Comments: 0
Chachazz @ 09-1-10 21:31
Read: 25   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 09-1-10 19:02
Read: 22   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 09-1-10 18:54
Read: 33   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 09-1-10 18:48
Read: 26   Comments: 0
Chachazz @ 09-1-10 05:07
Read: 32   Comments: 0
Cyn @ 09-1-10 00:50
Read: 95   Comments: 5
cubfan56 @ 08-31-10 23:11
Read: 78   Comments: 4
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 18:32
Read: 26   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 18:30
Read: 28   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 17:51
Read: 43   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 17:48
Read: 27   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 17:46
Read: 23   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 17:43
Read: 23   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 17:41
Read: 28   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-31-10 17:40
Read: 27   Comments: 0
Chachazz @ 08-31-10 05:15
Read: 26   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 08-30-10 23:35
Read: 30   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 08-30-10 19:50
Read: 49   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 08-30-10 17:07
Read: 44   Comments: 0
Terryala @ 08-30-10 16:30
Read: 36   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-29-10 18:57
Read: 44   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-29-10 18:53
Read: 48   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-29-10 18:45
Read: 80   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-29-10 18:40
Read: 45   Comments: 0
TheSentinel @ 08-29-10 18:36
Read: 57   Comments: 0
 
> Survey scammers serve up supposed shelter from survey scams
Posted by Terryala - 09-1-10 18:54 - 0 comments
Survey scammers serve up supposed shelter from survey scams

QUOTE
Kind of ironic when you think about it

By John Leyden •

Posted in Malware, 1st September 2010 12:18 GM

Cheeky scammers are offering prospective marks an application that supposedly shields them from exposure to survey scams.

Naturally, you first have to fill in a survey to install the script, which is punted through Userscripts(dot)org. Odds are that even after jumping through these hoops users will still be exposed to surveys and, possibly, left at a heightened risk of malware infection.

"'Only install scripts from sources you trust' is on the install box for a reason," security researcher Christopher Boyd, of GFI Security, notes. Boyd's write-up of the scam can be found here.

Survey scams are becoming increasing common on social networks. Scammers (affiliates) profit from wasting surfers' time with the Web 2.0 equivalent of email spam. Often the spammers attempt to hoodwink users into signing up to premium rate SMS services.

A study by F-Secure, published last week, took advantage of the web analytic tools used by scammers to investigate the response rates of survey scams.

For example, one recent social network spam run, themed around McDonalds, attracted 32,000 clicks, and a conversion rate of 40 percent.

F-Secure notes that these sizeable figures are lower than those pulled in by earlier scams. A survey scam that used supposed footage of a teacher beating a disobedient student pulled in 140,000 hits six weeks ago, for example, because users are getting wise to the ruse.

"The 32,000 clicks is far less than similar spam from just two months ago when we saw several examples of viral links that yielded hundreds of thousands of clicks," writes Sean Sullivan, a security advisor at F-Secure.

"Returns are diminishing as people are exposed, develop a resistance, and recognise Facebook spam for what it is."

Despite increased user awareness, however, it's unlikely that survey spam scams will disappear anytime soon, F-Secure warns.

"Social networking spammers don't need to dupe very many people in order to be rewarded for their efforts," said Sullivan. "Many of the surveys lead to SMS subscriptions (particularly outside of the USA) and there's good money to be made.

"And because the conversion rates are better than e-mail spam, you can be certain that it won't be going away any time soon." ®


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/01/survey_scam_spam/
Read 33 times - make a comment   

> Huge spamming botnet injured but still alive
Posted by TheSentinel - 08-31-10 17:51 - 0 comments
QUOTE
Huge spamming botnet injured but still alive
By Jeremy Kirk
August 31, 2010 11:29 AM ET

IDG News Service - A botnet responsible for a significant amount of spam has been crippled but may reconstitute itself in a matter of weeks, according to vendor M86 Security.

The Pushdo or Cutwail network of hacked computers ranked in the top five or so botnets for spam, responsible for as much as 10 percent of all spam, said Ed Rowley, product manager for M86 Security. The spam often advertises fake software, so-called designer goods and questionable pharmaceutical products.

But security analysts with the computer security company LastLine took action last week, contacting ISPs that were hosting the command-and-control infrastructure for the botnet.

More:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/918...but_still_alive
Read 43 times - make a comment   

> Apple QuickTime backdoor creates code-execution peril
Posted by Terryala - 08-30-10 19:50 - 0 comments
Apple QuickTime backdoor creates code-execution peril

QUOTE
Getting punked by 9-year-old parameter

By Dan Goodin in San Francisco •

Posted in Malware, 30th August 2010 19:27 GMT

A security researcher has unearthed a “bizarre” flaw in Apple's QuickTime Player that can be exploited to remotely execute malicious code on Windows-based PCs, even those running the most recent versions of operating system.

Technically, the inclusion of an unused parameter known as “_Marshaled_pUnk” is a backdoor because it is the work of an Apple developer who added it to to the QuickTime code base and then, most likely, forgot to remove it when it was no longer needed. It sat largely undetected for at least nine years until Ruben Santamarta of Spain-based security firm Wintercore discovered it and realized it could be exploited to take full control of machines running Windows 7, Microsoft's most secure operating system to date.

“The bug is is pretty bizarre,” H D Moore, CSO and chief architect of the Metasploit project, told The Reg on Monday. “It's not a standard vulnerability in the sense that a feature was implemented poorly. It was more kind of a leftover development piece that was left in production. It's probably an oversight.”

The presence of _Marshaled_pUnk creates the equivalent of an object pointer that an attacker can use to funnel malicious code into computer memory. Over the years, applications have contained so many of these types of errors that Microsoft eventually built architectural designs into Windows that reduced the damage that can be inflicted from attacks that exploit them.

ASLR, or address space layout randomization, for instance, loaded code into memory locations that attackers can't predict, while DEP, or data execution prevention, prevented any code that does get loaded from being executed.

But in a stroke of efficiency, Santamarta figured out how to repurpose code in a common Windows file to bypass the protections. Using a technique known as ROP, short for return oriented programming, he was able to load a Windows Live file known as WindowsLiveLogin.dll into memory and reorder the commands in a way that allowed him to take control of the underlying computer. Using the Microsoft DLL not only allowed him to know where in memory it would load, it also allowed him to get the the code executed.

Santamarta said the parameter was present in a QuickTime version dating back to 2001, when it could be used to draw contents onto an existing window instead of creating a new one. The functionality was eventually removed from newer versions but the line lived on. Combined with an unrandomized DLL like the one for Windows Live, it represents a serious threat to end users.

The attack has been confirmed on the XP, Vista and 7 versions of Windows 7, Santamarta said.

In addition to demonstrating the importance of regular code reviews to identify extraneous parameters, the exploit underscores the threat that comes from programs that fail to use of the ASLR and DEP protections baked into more recent versions of Windows. A surprisingly large number of popular applications – including Quicktime, Foxit Reader, Google Picasa, OpenOffice.org, RealPlayer and VLC Player – all neglect to use one or the other, a recent review by Secunia found.

While the exploit posted by Santamarta works only against those who have Microsoft's Windows Live Messenger installed, the researcher told The Reg that components that ship by default with QuickTime can be used to pull off the same ROP sleight of hand. Files called QuickTimeAuthoring.qtx and QuickTime.qts are two possibilities.

Indeed, programmers with the open-source Metasploit project used by penetration testers and other hackers are in the process of building an attack module that does just that. And that means, in the next 24 hours, there will be publicly available exploit code for a critical vulnerability that remains unpatched in Apple's blockbuster media player for Windows.

All because of an obsolete parameter named _Marshaled_pUnk. Go figure.


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/30/ap..._critical_vuln/
Read 49 times - make a comment   

> Microsoft tool for DLL vulnerability interferes with some applications
Posted by Terryala - 08-30-10 16:30 - 0 comments
Microsoft tool for DLL vulnerability interferes with some applications


Microsoft's tool to protect against the DLL hijacking vulnerability, which was released last week, results in some programs no longer working properly. Users who want to use the tool to reliably prevent attackers from passing infected libraries to trusted applications should set the new registry key DWORD value to 0xFFFFFFFF ("ffffffff"). This removes the working directory, which could be located on a network share, from Windows' list of locations to search for DLLs.

But this causes problems for programs which use precisely this search behaviour, but which are not, necessarily, vulnerable to DLL hijacking. The most prominent example is the current stable version of Google Chrome. If the registry key is set, the browser fails to find the avutil-50.dll file when the user opens the program or a new tab. If a web page contains an HTML5 video element, the entire web page fails to display. On our Windows 7 test system, open source graphics program GIMP was also no longer able to find its plugins. According to user reports, games service Steam and the Java plugin for Mozilla also encounter difficulties.

Such cases can be resolved by either individually excluding problem applications from using the modified search behaviour or watering down security measures for the problem programs. To do so, a new DWORD registry key called CWDIllegalInDllSearch should be created in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\Program Name.exe\ and set to '0'. This causes the application to use Windows' standard list of search locations, but of course makes it once more vulnerable to DLL hijacking.

A reasonable compromise is to set the value to '2' – this causes the working directory to be excluded from the list of search locations only if it is a network directory. This, at least, protects against remote attacks, where the user is redirected to crafted SMB or WebDAV shares. Setting this value to '1' protects against WebDAV-based DLL hijacking attacks only.

Certainly the cleanest solution would be updates for the affected programs, but provision of such has so far been patchy. For example, the VLC and uTorrent development teams have reacted rapidly to the publication of exploits – currently springing up in great profusion – and have protected their applications from DLL hijacking. Users wishing to keep on top of the expected flood of patches may wish to chance a look at Secunia's PSI. The freeware tool accesses a large database of programs and informs users when newer versions of applications installed on their system become available. Exploit Database and Corelan.be both offer lists of vulnerable applications.

According to security expert Tim Brown, some Linux distributions may also be prone to the problem – if the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not set, applications may load libraries from the user's current working directory. However, according to comments made by Brown to Threatpost, this is not easy to exploit.

http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item...ns-1069540.html
Read 36 times - make a comment   

> Kaspersky Lab spots new breed of IM worm
Posted by TheSentinel - 08-29-10 18:45 - 0 comments
QUOTE
Kaspersky Lab spots new breed of IM worm

Cyber criminals able to wreak havoc on several IM clients simultaneously

Phil Muncaster

V3.co.uk, 27 Aug 2010

Security experts are warning users to be on guard against a new family of computer worms spreading via a variety of instant messaging (IM) clients.

Kaspersky Lab said it has detected four variants of the IM-Worm.Win32.Zeroll worm so far.

The malware is unusual because it is multi-lingual and is able to spread over several IM clients simultaneously, including Yahoo Messenger, Skype, Paltalk Messenger, ICQ, Windows Live Messenger, Google Talk and the XFire client for gamers

More:
http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2268885/kasper...-spots-breed-im
Read 80 times - make a comment   

> Military Computer Attack Confirmed
Posted by TheSentinel - 08-29-10 18:36 - 0 comments
QUOTE
Military Computer Attack Confirmed
By BRIAN KNOWLTON
Published: August 25, 2010

WASHINGTON — A top Pentagon official has confirmed a previously classified incident that he describes as “the most significant breach of U.S. military computers ever,” a 2008 episode in which a foreign intelligence agent used a flash drive to infect computers, including those used by the Central Command in overseeing combat zones in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Plugging the cigarette-lighter-sized flash drive into an American military laptop at a base in the Middle East amounted to “a digital beachhead, from which data could be transferred to servers under foreign control,” according to William J. Lynn 3d, deputy secretary of defense, writing in the latest issue of the journal Foreign Affairs.

“It was a network administrator’s worst fear: a rogue program operating silently, poised to deliver operational plans into the hands of an unknown adversary,” Mr. Lynn wrote.

More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/26/technolo...cyber.html?_r=1
Read 57 times - make a comment   

> Rootkit with Blue Screen history now targets 64-bit Windows
Posted by Terryala - 08-27-10 19:02 - 0 comments
Rootkit with Blue Screen history now targets 64-bit Windows

QUOTE
'New era,' says researcher of rootkit that bypasses 64-bit kernel defenses by infecting hard drive's boot record
By Gregg Keizer
August 27, 2010 06:42 AM ET

Computerworld - A new version of the malware that crippled Windows PCs last February sidesteps safeguards designed to block rootkits from hijacking machines running 64-bit editions of Windows, researchers said Thursday.

"A new era has officially dawned: the era of x64 rootkits," said Prevx researcher Marco Giuliani in a post to the security vendor's blog yesterday.

The updated rootkit, which goes by names that include Alureon, TDL, TLD3 and Tidserv, is able to infect 64-bit Windows PCs. "TLD3 can be considered as the first x64-compatible kernel mode rootkit infection in the wild," Giuliani said.

Both Prevx and Symantec have found evidence that hackers are actively using the rootkit.

"The infection is spreading on the Web, by using both porn Web sites and exploit kits," said Giuliani, who added that Derby, England-based Prevx had first spotted the new rootkit more than a week ago. Symantec's first sighting was Wednesday.

A previous version of the rootkit caused serious problems earlier this year after a Microsoft security update crashed 32-bit Windows machines.

Within hours of the Feb. 9, 2010, release of security update MS10-015, users reported that their computers wouldn't restart. Two days later, Microsoft halted automatic distribution of the update and launched an investigation.

MS10-015 patched a 17-year-old Windows kernel bug that was publicly disclosed in January 2010 by Google security engineer Tavis Ormandy.

Microsoft later concluded that only PCs already infected with a rootkit it called Alureon were incapacitated with Blue Screen of Death errors. It didn't restart the distribution of MS10-015 until early March, when it added code to block installation when a rootkit infection was detected. Subsequent kernel patches have included that same detection.

During the Blue Screen of Death brouhaha, the then-current Alureon was able to successfully infect only 32-bit versions of Windows. That limitation no longer applies.

The new rootkit sidesteps two important anti-rootkit protections Microsoft built into 64-bit Windows: Kernel Mode Code Signing and Kernel Patch Protection, also known as PatchGuard. The pair are designed to make it more difficult for malware to tamper with the operating system's kernel.

"To bypass Kernel Patch Protection and driver signature verification, the rootkit is patching the hard drive's master boot record so that it can intercept Windows' start-up routines, own it and load its driver," Giuliani said.

Rootkits that overwrite the hard drive's master boot record (MBR), where code is stored to bootstrap the operating system after the computer's BIOS does its start-up checks, are essentially invisible to the operating system and security software.

"The main Tidserv components are stored in unused space at the end of the hard drive in encrypted form," said Symantec researchers in a Thursday note on the company's security response blog. "This makes it more difficult to detect and remove once a computer is infected."

Both Prevx and Symantec said that they were continuing to analyze the 64-bit rootkit, and would publish more information when they had it.


http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/918...s?taxonomyId=89
Read 88 times - make a comment   

> Attackers exploit DLL vulnerability in Office and other applications
Posted by Terryala - 08-27-10 18:57 - 0 comments
Attackers exploit DLL vulnerability in Office and other applications


The Internet Storm Centre reports that criminals are already exploiting a DLL vulnerability in numerous applications. Applications targeted by attackers include Microsoft Office, WindowsMail and uTorrent. The number of vulnerable applications is rising almost hourly – searching Exploit Database for "DLL hijacking" reveals that new exploits targeted at popular applications are constantly appearing. Other affected applications include Photoshop and Thunderbird. Updates are already available for VLC (1.1.4) and uTorrent (2.0.4) which protect against DLL hijacking.

DLL hijacking, also known as binary planting, involves attackers exploiting the way Windows searches for DLLs. If a developer fails to explicitly define the path for a DLL, the operating system sequentially searches a series of directories for the required DLL. The penultimate directory searched is usually the working directory, which could be a network share. There are occasions when an application will attempt to load a DLL without knowing in advance whether it's actually installed, for example, when selecting a a video codec. If the program requests a DLL which is not found on a typical system, the operating system will automatically check the working directory.

This means that, for example, when a user starts Media Player Classic by double-clicking on an MP3 file from an SMB or WedDAV share, the program will search the share for the optional iacenc.dll codec library. If an attacker has placed a crafted file of with this name in the same directory, malicious code contained in the file will be loaded and executed. Users can protect themselves using a tool for system administrators published by Microsoft. After the tool has been installed, the DLL search sequence can be modified using a new registry key and the working directory excluded from the search. However, software developers are being asked to fix the vulnerability in their own applications – Microsoft does not currently plan to release a patch to fix the issue.

There is plenty of room for debate over whether documentation, developer tools or programmers themselves are at fault. The NSA issued a warning about the underlying problem 12 years ago and Microsoft security expert David LeBlanc also pointed out the risk on his blog more than two years ago. It seems that up until now though, no-one noticed that the vulnerability could also be exploited over network shares.

http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item...ns-1068583.html
Read 69 times - make a comment   

> Sophos warns of fake anti-virus spam campaign
Posted by TheSentinel - 08-26-10 18:35 - 0 comments
QUOTE
Sophos warns of fake anti-virus spam campaign

Llatest scareware outbreak features emails with malicious HTML attachments

Phil Muncaster

V3.co.uk, 26 Aug 2010

Security vendor Sophos is warning of a major spam campaign designed to trick users into downloading fake anti-virus software.

In a blog post, Sophos senior technology consultant Graham Cluley explained that the unsolicited emails arrive with subject lines such as “You're invited to view my photos!”, “Appointment Confirmation”, or “Your Bell e-bill is ready”.

“Opening the attached HTML file, however, redirects your web browser to a hacked web site containing a malicious iFrame [which Sophos detects as Troj/Iframe-FK],” said Cluley.

More about:
http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2268786/sophos...fake-anti-virus
Read 83 times - make a comment   

> Full-Body Scan Technology Deployed In Street-Roving Vans
Posted by TheSentinel - 08-26-10 11:17 - 1 comments
QUOTE
Aug. 24 2010 - 12:00 pm

Andy Greenberg
The Firewall

Full-Body Scan Technology Deployed In Street-Roving Vans

As the privacy controversy around full-body security scans begins to simmer, it’s worth noting that courthouses and airport security checkpoints aren’t the only places where backscatter x-ray vision is being deployed. The same technology, capable of seeing through clothes and walls, has also been rolling out on U.S. streets.

American Science & Engineering, a company based in Billerica, Massachusetts, has sold U.S. and foreign government agencies more than 500 backscatter x-ray scanners mounted in vans that can be driven past neighboring vehicles to see their contents, Joe Reiss, a vice president of marketing at the company told me in an interview. While the biggest buyer of AS&E’s machines over the last seven years has been the Department of Defense operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, Reiss says law enforcement agencies have also deployed the vans to search for vehicle-based bombs in the U.S.

More about that:
http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010...et-roving-vans/
Read 110 times - last comment by TheSentinel   

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd September 2010 - 12:41 AM


Design by: Skins IPB & Web Browsers