Jump to content


Photo

Desktop Virtualization: Parallels vs. VMware vs. VirtualBox


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 TheSentinel

TheSentinel

    The man in the dark

  • General Admin
  • 22,433 posts

Posted 14 October 2011 - 07:19 PM

QUOTE
Oct 14, 2011 6:51 pm
Desktop Virtualization: Parallels vs. VMware vs. VirtualBox

By Brian Proffitt, Computerworld

Virtual machines are the best way to accommodate different application needs in a datacenter environment. Whether you need to run your apps on a specific platform, or just need to meet scaling requirements, virtualization is the solution to a lot of IT manager's problems, thanks to fast and cheap memory.

But what about the desktop? As a technology writer, I use virtualization all the time, primarily to review new Linux distributions without taking up an entire machine's worth of data and resources. For everyday users, virtualization seems to be an unneeded luxury than anything else. Why would you need to run two operating systems at the same time?

...

I can think of three good reasons why virtualization on the desktop is a good idea.

More about that at:
http://www.pcworld.c....html#tk.hp_new

Desktop virtualization first steps:
http://www.itworld.c...ion-first-steps

Give users the virtual desktop they want
http://www.itworld.c...sktop-they-want

Behind the scenes of Wellesley College's desktop virtualization rollout
http://www.itworld.c...ization-rollout



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users