Jump to content


Photo

"Do Not Track" Has It Backwards


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 TheSentinel

TheSentinel

    The man in the dark

  • General Admin
  • 22,429 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 07:30 PM

QUOTE
Feb 24, 2012 7:31 pm
"Do Not Track" Has It Backwards

By Tony Bradley, PCWorld

Google is doing its part for Internet privacy by adding a Do Not Track feature to its Chrome Web browser. The move is admirable, and Do Not Track may be better than nothing, but why should users have to opt out of having their online actions monitored?

The move from Google comes in the wake of allegations that it has been circumventing privacy controls in the Safari Web browser on iOS devices, and in Internet Explorer to track online activity. However, it is not a reaction to that controversy. A Google spokesperson told me: ?We've been evaluating our [Do Not Track] options for a long time and have also been closely involved with standards bodies.?

Google is jumping on the "Do Not Track" bandwagon by adding the feature to the Chrome browser.
It also comes on the heels of increased pressure from Washington DC in the form of President Obama?s blueprint for a Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights. Susan Wojcicki, Google Senior Vice President for Advertising, praised that initiative. ?We?re pleased to join a broad industry agreement to respect the ?Do Not Track? header in a consistent and meaningful way that offers users choice and clearly explained browser controls.?

More details: http://www.pcworld.c....html#tk.hp_new


#2 TheSentinel

TheSentinel

    The man in the dark

  • General Admin
  • 22,429 posts

Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:59 PM

Please read in addition too:

QUOTE
FAQ: What Google's 'Do Not Track' move means
Google will add support for anti-tracking tech to Chrome browser before year's end
By Gregg Keizer
February 24, 2012 12:53 PM ET

http://www.computerw...rack_move_means



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users