Jump to content


Photo

Wishlist V3


  • Please log in to reply
74 replies to this topic

#16 Ilya Rabinovich

Ilya Rabinovich

    - DefenseWall -

  • SoftSphere Technologies
  • 4,896 posts

Posted 13 June 2008 - 11:27 AM

There is an option to include all the folder into untrusted. Why more?

#17 coen

coen

    Active Member

  • Active Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 14 June 2008 - 09:58 AM


Ok, let's say I share my computer/user (sometimes unwillingly ;-) and others like installing things they got from friends etc.
Also some P2P stuff.
Of course you can set CDROM's untrusted (mostly they copy everything to my harddrive first)
and also set all folders on my harddrive untrusted but another easier way, in my opinion, is to say *.exe and *.msi are untrusted.
It's just an suggestion, there are lot ways leading to Rome but this was mine.




#18 IDH

IDH

    Active Member

  • Active Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 14 June 2008 - 03:35 PM

QUOTE (Scoobs @ Mar 11 2008, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A simple request this which could be implemented before V3....on the Alarm Notifications it would be useful to provide a recommended action, particularly for keylogger behaviour that is detected. e.g. "......reads keystrokes via RegisterRawInputDevices. This behaviour is highly suspicious and may be due to malware. Terminate is recommended." Whilst the existing alarm text would enable many DW users to assess the threat (or otherwise), more novice users are likely to click "OK" and allow the potentially dangerous activity to continue.


This is something that would help the "less knowledgeable" user. [like me rolleyes.gif ]. I would also like to see the pop-up notifications colour coded to indicate the possible severity of the detection, ie: as in Threatfire.

Ian

#19 LoneWolf

LoneWolf

    Adv. Member

  • Active Members
  • 90 posts

Posted 27 June 2008 - 02:32 AM

Any type of application/outbound control planned for the future?

#20 Ilya Rabinovich

Ilya Rabinovich

    - DefenseWall -

  • SoftSphere Technologies
  • 4,896 posts

Posted 27 June 2008 - 07:36 AM

Yes, for the 2.50 version. But right now I keep my hands on fixing current problems and issues- don't like the idea to have it behind unfixed.

#21 LoneWolf

LoneWolf

    Adv. Member

  • Active Members
  • 90 posts

Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:05 PM

QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Jun 27 2008, 03:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes, for the 2.50 version.


Looking forward to the new feature. thumbsup.gif

QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Jun 27 2008, 03:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But right now I keep my hands on fixing current problems and issues- don't like the idea to have it behind unfixed.


And that's what I like, fix what needs to be fixed before adding new features. thumbsup.gif

Just another question Ilya...........
Is there any plans or thoughts about in the future of adding something to help protect aginst scripts? XSS in particular ?
I know I can use Firefox w/no script but I prefer Opera browser.

#22 Ilya Rabinovich

Ilya Rabinovich

    - DefenseWall -

  • SoftSphere Technologies
  • 4,896 posts

Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:25 PM

Script-based attacks protection is the browsers job. No HIPS can solve it as requires deep HTML and script engines integration.

#23 jjmonge

jjmonge

    Sen. Member

  • Active Members
  • 235 posts

Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:32 PM

QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Jul 15 2008, 05:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Script-based attacks protection is the browsers job. No HIPS can solve it as requires deep HTML and script engines integration.


internet explorer beta 8 solve this problem,cause they built a xss filter thumbsup.gif


#24 LoneWolf

LoneWolf

    Adv. Member

  • Active Members
  • 90 posts

Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:36 PM

QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Jul 15 2008, 01:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Script-based attacks protection is the browsers job. No HIPS can solve it as requires deep HTML and script engines integration.


Thank you.

#25 LoneWolf

LoneWolf

    Adv. Member

  • Active Members
  • 90 posts

Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:39 PM

QUOTE (jjmonge @ Jul 15 2008, 01:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
internet explorer beta 8 solve this problem,cause they built a xss filter thumbsup.gif


Be nice if Opera had this sort of protection.
Maybe in the future.

#26 jjmonge

jjmonge

    Sen. Member

  • Active Members
  • 235 posts

Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:46 PM

QUOTE (LoneWolf @ Jul 15 2008, 05:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (jjmonge @ Jul 15 2008, 01:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
internet explorer beta 8 solve this problem,cause they built a xss filter thumbsup.gif


Be nice if Opera had this sort of protection.
Maybe in the future.


yes lonewolf.


#27 jjmonge

jjmonge

    Sen. Member

  • Active Members
  • 235 posts

Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:47 PM

noscript has it,firefox browser.

Edited by jjmonge, 15 July 2008 - 05:47 PM.


#28 acaetano

acaetano

    Active Member

  • Active Members
  • 38 posts

Posted 31 July 2008 - 10:26 PM

Hi Ilya,

From time to time I find myself wondering when some file listed in the untrusted applications list was added to that list.
So, I have this wish to have that information also. By the way, you already have dates (and exact times - this is important) in other lists, so it is just one more.
One possible use is when I started some installation as untrusted by mistake and I am able to cancel it. Then I would like to remove from the unstrusted list what had just been added there for this installation trial. Or maybe some of my children has unsuccessfully tried to install something and I might want to clean the untrusted list. But then I need to know exactly which files were created by the installation process, so the information about date and time can be quite useful here.

Coming to think about it, a warning message saying that some installation is about to be done in untrusted mode (asking if one really wants to proceed this way) would also be welcome.

Best regards,
acaetano.


Edited by acaetano, 04 August 2008 - 12:25 AM.


#29 w88nuke

w88nuke

    New Member

  • Member
  • 5 posts

Posted 16 March 2009 - 11:09 AM

A NEW "REPAIR" OPTION
-SELF DEFENSE (SRRY I ALREADY SAID IT)
-MORE STABILITY (SRRY I ALREADY SAID IT)->(in crappy vista. i got 2 comps using vista and 1 comp xp =( )

-MORE DETAILED HELP ARTICLE WILL BE NICE


thanks.



keep up the good work!

#30 LoneWolf

LoneWolf

    Adv. Member

  • Active Members
  • 90 posts

Posted 16 March 2009 - 03:52 PM

Application execute permission control.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users