QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

B) Comment- There is no option to maximize DW's "Add/Remove Untrusted" GUI. This makes it difficult to read the path & description columns.
C) DW's Rollback GUI can be maximized, & the columns resized for easier reading. However, after closing the GUI, all the format changes I made disappeared. Is there a way to make my format changes permanent?
Both options are in plans for 2.0 version.
QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

D) I notice hh.exe is, by default, placed into the untrusted category. I'm curious as to why?
It is .chm files support application. .chm are compiled and compressed .html pages, so there could be malicious JavaScript/VBScript code.
QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

E) I put my email client (Pop Peeper) on the untrusted list. When Pop Peeper received messages today, it put copies of those messages into a file on my D drive. Those messages on D drive did not get not listed on DW's Rollback list. Evidently DW considers the file containing those messages to be non-sensitive. Correct?
DW's rollback feature is limited becasue many users won't be able to use it anyway. It shows only files with few known extensions. There is other, full-featured registry-based list with all the files created/modified (auto-cleaned up in 3 days).
QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

F) A couple of questions about Rollback...
1) If I see an item on the Rollback list that I want to KEEP, I should remove it from the Rollback list. Correct?
Yes.
QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

2) If I forget to work with the Rollback list, & I shut down my computer, everything on the Rollback list will be killed. Correct?
No. This list remains.
QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

3) I thought DW was a sandbox. To me, the name "Rollback" makes it sound like changes will be subsequently deleted (rolled back) instead of being isolated & confined within a sandbox.
In fact, "sandbox" means "some area with the limited rights" that based on policy restrictions. "Rollback" feature is the list allow you manually remove malware is infected. Instead of file system virtualization tools, that are using "clean up virtualization container" technique for that (this is a huge possibility for user to make a mistake and erase something important), this allow you full control under the items you delete.
QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

a) To me, deleting or rolling back changes doesn't sound as secure as totally isolating & confining those changes within a sandbox.
Total isolation is not the main aim of sandbox HIPS tool. Its main aim is to break malware hidden installation & penetration into trusted processes area. Virtualization is just a techique to achive such the aim. The only thing is really important for sandbox HIPS is the balance between defense rate and usability. Advanced file system and registry virtualization tools are not very good is such the balance because of many compatibility/speed issues.
The only REAL total isolation tool I know are hardware virtualization tools (VMWare, VirtualPC, QEMU, Bosh,...). Others are simple emulators (they just create files®istry keys in other place, so-called "virtualization container" that contains into real file system folder/real registry key).
QUOTE (bellgamin @ Oct 31 2006, 09:42 PM)

b) Is DW a *real sandbox* -- or what?
Yes, it is real sandbox application, with highly limited registry-level virtualization. The main aim of DefenseWall HIPS project is not a virtualization itself (it's just a technique, nothing more), its main aim is a everyday usable and strong proactive anti-malware protection, that doesn't require people change its everyday work behaviour too much.
QUOTE (CogitoErgoSum @ Nov 1 2006, 12:39 AM)

In any case, if malware attempted to create a new file(s) and/or registry key(s) these changes will be isolated and contained within the sandbox and included in the RollBack list.
Not exactly. If the registry key is policy-restricted, it will be blocked but not created. Same thing is with file system.
QUOTE (toadbee @ Nov 1 2006, 02:19 AM)

By the by, I believe the rollback list trims itself at 15 days or some such thing
Not now, it is for the 2.0 version.