Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 9 2009, 08:51 AM
Hi everybody!
Pre-2.52 is here for your tests. This build fixes a few issues, but he most important here is CPU usage by periodical check functions.
www.softsphere.com/files/DefenseWall_HIPS_v2_52.exe
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 9 2009, 12:31 PM
The build is updated.
ruinebabine
Mar 9 2009, 12:45 PM
Here is DW's last build CPU usage (Win Pro sp2, "Periodically check applications from built-in list" and "Show logs" are not activated), if it could help:
demoneye
Mar 9 2009, 05:10 PM
here is to much cpu usage(spraking) in short time , like defesewall seeking for something ... i am talking about 0 - 25 cpu use...
Creer
Mar 9 2009, 05:40 PM
To be honest - i didn't noticed any changes in CPU usage/time in my case it looks the same as in previous version.
Process Lasso after ~3-4h browsing shows average CPU usage = ~3%
CPU Time in Windows Task Manager = ~12min
demoneye
Mar 9 2009, 06:52 PM
QUOTE (Creer @ Mar 9 2009, 06:40 PM)

To be honest - i didn't noticed any changes in CPU usage/time in my case it looks the same as in previous version.
Process Lasso after ~3-4h browsing shows average CPU usage = ~3%
CPU Time in Windows Task Manager = ~12min
try look in windows task manger at "defensewall.exe" and tell to what high does the cpu sparks goes... and for how long
Scoobs
Mar 9 2009, 07:20 PM
QUOTE (Creer @ Mar 9 2009, 05:40 PM)

CPU Time in Windows Task Manager = ~12min
Creer, how does your 12 minutes compare to other applications?
Scoobs
Mar 9 2009, 07:49 PM
Just started testing pre-2.52 and I can see a BIG improvement in CPU use. CPU time is now back down to what it was in Defensewall several versions ago.
Creer
Mar 9 2009, 08:28 PM
QUOTE (demoneye @ Mar 9 2009, 07:52 PM)

try look in windows task manger at "defensewall.exe" and tell to what high does the cpu sparks goes... and for how long
max value is ~10%
Creer
Mar 9 2009, 08:37 PM
QUOTE (Scoobs @ Mar 9 2009, 08:20 PM)

QUOTE (Creer @ Mar 9 2009, 05:40 PM)

CPU Time in Windows Task Manager = ~12min
Creer, how does your 12 minutes compare to other applications?
Current results- after ~5-6h - From higher:
Opera Browser: ~43min
defensewall.exe: ~16min
explorer: ~12min
System: ~11min
Online Armor 1#process: ~4min
Online Armor 2#process: ~3,5min
ruinebabine
Mar 9 2009, 08:52 PM
QUOTE (Creer @ Mar 9 2009, 08:37 PM)

Current results- after ~5-6h - From high to low
Here are mines, after about 5 hrs:
DefenseWall .... 36 min
K-Meleon ........ 27 min
System ........... 13 min
Proxomitron ..... 10 min
Explorer ............ 8 min
csrss.exe ........... 2.5 min
demoneye
Mar 9 2009, 09:12 PM
QUOTE (Ruinebob-Inn @ Mar 9 2009, 09:52 PM)

QUOTE (Creer @ Mar 9 2009, 08:37 PM)

Current results- after ~5-6h - From high to low
Here are mines, after about 5 hrs:
DefenseWall .... 36 min
K-Meleon ........ 27 min
System ........... 13 min
Proxomitron ..... 10 min
Explorer ........... 8 min
seems defensewall 2.52 suck 2 much cpu power as i claim before. its interfere with games and surely slow down browsing, and other pc tasks
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 9 2009, 09:52 PM
So, do you have any improvements with the latest build?
ruinebabine
Mar 9 2009, 10:04 PM
QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 9 2009, 09:52 PM)

So, do you have any improvements with the latest build?
The highest cpu peaks have lowered a bit, but the other numbers stay about the same here (see the graph pict in the post #3 in this thread).
demoneye
Mar 9 2009, 10:14 PM
ilya i dont understand why DW need to use some much cpu so often , even if it check like u said before that all programs are untrusted... look little odd to me ...
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 10 2009, 08:54 AM
It checks:
1. Resource protection list.
2. Built-in untrusted list.
If you still have a huge CPU spikes, you have to contact me via support e-mail I could send you test executables back to profile the problem sections.
demoneye
Mar 10 2009, 09:15 AM
i gave DW a night test(didn't touch the pc) , with 9 process under it , firefox was open , a bout 9 sites open ,Periodically check applications was checked also , and here are the results
system idle process 7:12:31
defensewall.exe 0:58:45
firefox.exe :0:29:33
system 0:11:18
explorer 0:4:57
i use winxp sp3 + DW 2.52 , its seems this build even it use lots cpu requests, it doesn't slow or interfere with pc speed much or what so ever...
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 10 2009, 09:36 AM
There is a big difference between CPU requests and CPU usage. Naturally, DW do a lot of requests as it displaying a status at title bars with its main GUI module, without injecting additional modules into the processes. But, one more time- if it do not disrupts your regular work/gaming, it's all OK.
So, my main concern is about CPU usage.
demoneye
Mar 10 2009, 11:24 AM
QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 10 2009, 10:36 AM)

There is a big difference between CPU requests and CPU usage. Naturally, DW do a lot of requests as it displaying a status at title bars with its main GUI module, without injecting additional modules into the processes. But, one more time- if it do not disrupts your regular work/gaming, it's all OK.
So, my main concern is about CPU usage.
gaming is running
OK , so i assume this issue is coming to his end (for now :) )
Creer
Mar 10 2009, 02:01 PM
QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 10 2009, 10:36 AM)

There is a big difference between CPU requests and CPU usage. Naturally, DW do a lot of requests as it displaying a status at title bars with its main GUI module, without injecting additional modules into the processes. But, one more time- if it do not disrupts your regular work/gaming, it's all OK.
So, my main concern is about CPU usage.
Max value of CPU usage which i have noticed was ~10% but i don't look still on Windows Task Manager so maybe sometimes it is higher i don't know. BTW is there any software which could tell me about the highest level (in this case) CPU usage selected process/application running on my system?
Trespasser
Mar 11 2009, 08:37 PM
I must say this beta of 2.52 is running very smooth/light on my system. I hardly notice that it's even there. Nice.
Question. My wife and I are planning on going to the beach this summer. I assume there will be wireless public access points. My question....will the selection under Options titled "Run from local area network sources as untrusted" protect our notebook?
Thanks for any info on this.
Later....
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 11 2009, 09:08 PM
If you are not going to use that local network resources- no, it won't helps. But a well-tuned inbound packet firewall and using strong security (at least WPA, WPA2 is the best choice, WEP is crap) access points can.
Chachazz
Mar 11 2009, 10:52 PM
QUOTE (Trespasser @ Mar 11 2009, 01:37 PM)

I must say this beta of 2.52 is running very smooth/light on my system. I hardly notice that it's even there. Nice.
Question. My wife and I are planning on going to the beach this summer. I assume there will be wireless public access points. My question....will the selection under Options titled "Run from local area network sources as untrusted" protect our notebook?
Thanks for any info on this.
Later....
Firewall and using VPN is best protection...public WIFI is risky.
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 12 2009, 04:09 PM
The build is just updated.
demoneye
Mar 12 2009, 05:23 PM
ilya what have been update? its says 2.52
andro
Mar 12 2009, 06:26 PM
I've installed pre-2.52 v. and want to notice, that this version uses less CPU (the average CPU usage is less than when there was v. 2.51 installed). But perhaps I'm wrong.
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 12 2009, 06:30 PM
QUOTE (demoneye @ Mar 12 2009, 05:23 PM)

ilya what have been update? its says 2.52
They all are 2.52, but the builds are different.
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 12:00 AM
QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 12 2009, 06:30 PM)

QUOTE (demoneye @ Mar 12 2009, 05:23 PM)

ilya what have been update? its says 2.52
They all are 2.52, but the builds are different.
yes but there are changing , and it alwas 2.52 ....not like 2.51.1...2.51.2...2.52.2 etc
Kees1958
Mar 13 2009, 07:05 AM
Ilya could the CPU usage be caused by the contineous sending of text messages to secured applications (to show DW in the window header)
Scoobs
Mar 13 2009, 07:32 AM
Interesting thought Kees, however I note that Sandboxie also amends the window header with a couple of [#]s but doesn't have a CPU issue.
Scoobs
Mar 13 2009, 07:48 AM
I've run a quick experiment. I disabled resource protection and check built in list and rebooted. Even with no untrusted applications running DW is taking up CPU every now and then. I'm not saying it's a problem for me, I'm just curious as to what DW is actually doing to be eating CPU cycles when no untrusted apps are running and resource protection and built in list are disabled.
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 09:30 AM
ilya about this cpu uses , this way or another it is using it/eating it more than all other software protection i got , actually more than all of them together.
my question goes for if i disable periodically check , can it reduce the cpu uses?
and does i loose protection coz of this disable? is it critical?
ps: last build i d/l again freezes my games time 2 time even periodically check unchecked
10x
ruinebabine
Mar 13 2009, 01:21 PM
The CPU usage has lowered by much (about half of what it was) with the very last build here (after 2 hours of monitoring).
---
EDIT: Oops, it seems I talk too early, it seem to be returned now to what it was :(
(see
screenshot)
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 01:47 PM
QUOTE (Ruinebob-Inn @ Mar 13 2009, 01:21 PM)

The CPU usage has lowered by much (about half of what it was) with the very last build here (after 2 hours of monitoring).
so its maybe aint enough , duno , other hips i used and test never encore such a
dramatic CPU use .
Solaris
Mar 13 2009, 02:04 PM
Hi Ruinebob-Inn,
What software you used for these nice processes/CPU graphics ?
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 13 2009, 02:35 PM
QUOTE (Kees1958 @ Mar 13 2009, 07:05 AM)

Ilya could the CPU usage be caused by the contineous sending of text messages to secured applications (to show DW in the window header)
CPU time usage- yes, CPU spikes- no.
ruinebabine
Mar 13 2009, 03:11 PM
QUOTE (Solaris @ Mar 13 2009, 02:04 PM)

Hi Ruinebob-Inn,
What software you used for these nice processes/CPU graphics ?
Anvir Task Manager Pro for CPU monitoring, and SnagIt for snapshots/anotations.
Scoobs
Mar 13 2009, 03:30 PM
QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 13 2009, 02:35 PM)

QUOTE (Kees1958 @ Mar 13 2009, 07:05 AM)

Ilya could the CPU usage be caused by the contineous sending of text messages to secured applications (to show DW in the window header)
CPU time usage- yes, CPU spikes- no.
So how does Sandboxie, which also skins the sandboxed program with additional text, get round this and show virtually no CPU time usage?
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 03:38 PM
QUOTE (Scoobs @ Mar 13 2009, 03:30 PM)

QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 13 2009, 02:35 PM)

QUOTE (Kees1958 @ Mar 13 2009, 07:05 AM)

Ilya could the CPU usage be caused by the contineous sending of text messages to secured applications (to show DW in the window header)
CPU time usage- yes, CPU spikes- no.
So how does Sandboxie, which also skins the sandboxed program with additional text, get round this and show virtually no CPU time usage?
big question , hope ilya can answered it
ruinebabine
Mar 13 2009, 04:26 PM
Finally, I booted on a pretty clean and patched win pro sp2 snapshot , and installed DW+Anvir+SnagIt. So this should give a good baseline picture of DefenseWall's CPU used for me.
see the resulting
graph.
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 04:53 PM
QUOTE (Ruinebob-Inn @ Mar 13 2009, 04:26 PM)

Finally, I booted on a pretty clean and patched win pro sp2 snapshot , and installed DW+Anvir+SnagIt. So this should give a good baseline picture of DefenseWall's CPU used for me.
see the resulting
graph.
what do u mean by "patched win" ? with tweeks?
ruinebabine
Mar 13 2009, 05:18 PM
QUOTE (demoneye @ Mar 13 2009, 05:53 PM)

what do u mean by "patched win" ? with tweeks?
Only Microsoft security patches for Windows XP Pro SP2.
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 05:21 PM
i will post my 2 same anvir software scale
it uses 47% of my cpu :(sometimes its 65%
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 13 2009, 07:12 PM
Yes, it's not normal. Looks like something is wrong. Please, check the latest pre-2.52 build I just uploaded.
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 07:21 PM
QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 13 2009, 07:12 PM)

Yes, it's not normal. Looks like something is wrong. Please, check the latest pre-2.52 build I just uploaded.
ilya remove old one and than installl?
so files be update and no leftover left...am i right?
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 13 2009, 07:23 PM
Install overtop and reboot.
demoneye
Mar 13 2009, 07:41 PM
QUOTE (Ilya Rabinovich @ Mar 13 2009, 07:23 PM)

Install overtop and reboot.
i uninstalled (keep setting) and install .... will give anvir some times to sample defensewall.exe cpu thing
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 13 2009, 07:44 PM
Aha, and don't forget to check if "remote assistance" feature works.
Scoobs
Mar 13 2009, 08:09 PM
I'm seeing further CPU improvement with this latest build, but what the hell is going on with disk usage in my screen capture????
Ilya Rabinovich
Mar 13 2009, 08:32 PM
Is that reads or writes?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.