"In this test, we conducted a comparative analysis of popular antivirus and personal network screens that are in the structure components of HIPS (Host Intrusion Prevention Systems), on the possibility of preventing the penetration of malicious programs on the level of the nucleus (hereafter Ring 0) of the operating system Microsoft Windows. If the malicious program manages penetrate to the level of the kernel, it gets full control over the victim's computer."


Click to view attachment

English - Translated page:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=e...antimalware.ru/

Russian homepage;
http://antimalware.ru/

I think that this test is not serious because this test does not cover all methods of "loading" in the OS-kernel and resistance to "loading" in the OS kernel is not top priority of Anti-Virus'es.

Hi RRB

can you proof your statement or is a believing like one?

Regards
B. Udo

Hi, The Sentiel!

Sorry, that forced a long wait.
I can proof my statement:

Top priority of Anti-Virus systems are detection of malware and treatment of active infection.
Resistance to "loading" in the OS kernel is one of the main priorities of proactive protection systems because top priority of proactive protection systems is prevention of active infection, but not detection and treatment of active infection.

--
Yours faithfully,
Rashevskiy Roman.